welcome to 20con! Written on June 13, 2010, by James Barnes.
As twenty-something millenials involved in professional Republican politics, the writers at 20con bring a truly fresh perspective, even to a profession that re-invents itself every election cycle. We’re the world’s first generation of digital natives, thriving on technology and the promise that it brings to a new age of electoral practice. We work in every sector of Washington, from e-politics, to political advertising, to policy analysis. And, like you, we’re passionate about taking America back. Interested in writing with us? Shoot us an email.
Read more from the 20Con category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: View Comments. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can
Trackback from your site.
Remember November: Part Three Written on June 18, 2010, by James Barnes.
A chill-inducing new video from the folks at the RGA. Enjoy:
Read more from the 2010 Elections, RGA, Videos category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: View Comments. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can
Trackback from your site.
Michael Steele’s One Year Job Review Written on February 23, 2010, by James Barnes.
Originally posted 1/9/2010
What up, GOP?
I’ve never been to Grover Norquist’s Wednesday meeting. It is, for many, a mainstay of the middle of the week and, for others, a launching pad into a fruitful career in Republican politics. But, for all who know about it, there’s no question that it is regarded the de-facto braintrust of the center-right coalition that makes up the Republican Party. Thus, when I woke up Wednesday morning after Tuesday’s two-count of Democratic retirements, I couldn’t but imagine that the coffee at ATR tasted a little better than it did yesterday.
But, on a day that should be regarded as a pretty good one for Republicans, it’s very likely that this group was a little distracted by, to borrow a little from the French, our faux pas du jour—our great Chairman’s tactful use of the phrase “honest injun” in describing a platform that nobody knows about. Or, perhaps, to digress a little further, the news that, under his leadership, the money to run the races that just became within our reach just may not exist (at least not under the RNC’s control)?
This is not an ad-hominem attack on Michael Steele—God knows the left has a monopoly on those. But, at some point, shouldn’t somebody step back and objectively evaluate, today almost one year after he was elected, how he’s performed in our party’s top job? Tragically, at this important moment in the history of our party and our nation, it’s very possible that, with seemingly endless embarrassments coming out of a cash-hemorrhaging RNC, Michael Steele has become a distraction worth dumping.
Notwithstanding the “honest injun” incident, the main political stories this year involving the RNC have centered on intra-party conflict and poor decisions by Mr. Steele. Most recently, The Washington Times reported on the disturbing trend of major donors fleeing the RNC as Steele makes paid appearances and prepares for his book tour on his six figure salary. Think about this for a second—in his capacity at the RNC, which pays him to give speeches and raise money, Chairman Steele has routinely collected speaking fees to stuff his personal bank account rather than fund our candidates. In many ways, this is tantamount to the CEO of a public company charging money to speak to his shareholders. Here’s a wake-up call, Mr. Chairman— the shareholders have noticed, and they’re no longer buying.
Read more from the 2010 Elections, Inside Baseball, RNC category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: View Comments. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can
Trackback from your site.
